![]() |
Alternative Culture Methods | |
| Economics | ||
| Engineering | ||
| Fish Health | ||
| Genetics | ||
| NCID | ||
| Nutrition | ||
| Potential Alternative Species | ||
| Quality Assurance | ||
| Shellfish | ||
| Water Quality | ||
| Yield Verification |
| May 22-24, 2006 UF Tropical Aquaculture Laboratory Attendees:
There were 30 participants from 13 institutions. Claude Reeves (Auburn) discussed a research/extension project with freshwater prawns cultured in 1,500 gallon tanks. Very few large prawns were produced with a range of 1 to 30 grams. The prawns in the system had a poor feed conversion ratio. Total production was around 20 to 25 pounds/tank with survival of 55 to 60%. The system incorporated substrate, one horsepower of aeration, and a 2 acre pond for water quality maintenance. The take away message for clientele is that the system has been tried but it is just not feasible for production. The system may have potential for either for nursery or temporary holding. Craig Tucker (NWAC) discussed the modified Partitioned Aquaculture System (PAS) currently being investigated in Stoneville. The system uses 0.15 acre for sequestering fish and 0.85 acre for water treatment. The temperature remains fairly consistent due to mixing. He has used hybrid catfish in the system for the last two years. He feels that the combination of the more resistant hybrids and using smallmouth buffalo as a biological control agent has significantly reduced the impact of proliferative gill disease. The system yielded a net production of 16,500 pounds/acre in 2005. Off-flavor is still a problem. NWAC is now developing a larger, modified Clemson system. |
| June 5-7, 2005 Attendees: There were 20 participants from 11 institutions. Facilitator: Dr. Jimmy Avery SESSION SUMMARY: There were no reports on this subject. |
| June 6-8, 2004
University of Arkansas, Pine Bluff Attendees: Jim Rakocy, UVI; Lou DAbramo, MSU; Steve Mims, KSU; Alex Kahovski, UAPB; Robert Romaire, LSU; Ray McClain, LSU; Peter Woods, TAMU; Jesse Chappell, AU; Hugh Thomforde, UAPB; Forrest Wynne, KSU; Patricia Duncan, FVSU; Nathan Stone, UAPB; and George Sheldon, UAPB. Facilitator: Bauer Duke, UAPB Co facilitator: Sathynand Kumaran, UAPB SESSION SUMMARY: Areas discussed: |
|
| · | Current methods in use and spin-offs |
| · | Considerations used in
presenting new systems to fish farmers |
| · | Variability of climate
throughout regions where experiments are conducted |
| · | Use of bacterial based systems, algal based systems, and combined systems |
| · | Satiation feeding |
| · | The PAS system |
The group looked at different methods currently in use and spin-offs of those methods in describing Alternative Methods of Culture. Concepts were taken from the Circular Autotrophic Bacterial System With Side Solids Removal (CABSWSSR) and the Aquaponics system studied in the Virgin Islands using tilapia; a trout raceway system used in Idaho; the PAS system using catfish and tilapia; and a spin-off of the PAS used in Louisiana with catfish. The group discussed considerations when spreading the word of new systems to fish farmers. The system has to work the first time a farmer uses it. This means our small experimental systems need to be scaled up and proved at the commercial level. We asked, What defines a commercial unit? If a farmer supplying fish to the live market needs 20,000 pounds in a week, a commercial unit might be one that produces that quantity. However, a commercial unit for a catfish producer sending fish to the processing plant has to be able to fill a truck with 40,000 pounds. We discussed the variability of climate throughout the region where experiments are conducted. We have to be careful about moving tropical culture methods to the temperate zone. The move is possible, but the economics need more study before the move is made. Aquaponics is currently used in the tropical and temperate zones, and in markets where the plants grown fetch high prices. Indeed this system emphasizes plant growth over fish growth. We discussed the use of bacterial based systems, algal-based systems and combined algal/bacterial systems. All have a place in aquaculture, but not all can be used in all places or at all commercial levels. Our role is to find out where these alternatives might be applied. Bacterial based recirculation systems are able to produce tilapia at an order of magnitude greater than the CABSWSSR, but the latter can be constructed much cheaper, and the operation costs are less. If the CABSWSSR is placed in the temperate zone, it must be able to run year-round and the use of cover, be it buildings or greenhouses, must be employed. Just as high value herbs are produced with Aquaponics, a by-product is created with this system. The captured solids have been referred to as liquid gold by farmers using them on their fields. Its cheaper than inorganic fertilizer and seems to release nutrients into the soil more slowly. Nutrient activity was present one year after application. Satiation feeding is currently conventional wisdom in most aquaculture sectors, but may not always be the best alternative. The Idaho trout industry ceased satiation feeding for their fish to comply with EPA effluent regulations. No longer do the fish determine how much they will eat. The FCRs are down, the effluent complies with EPA regulations and the farmers are making more money. The PAS system continues to attract researchers as a problem-solving device for catfish farmers. Concentration of the fish allows for easier feeding, harvesting and less area to protect from birds. The system prevents large shifts in water quality. This was also found with the CABSWSSR, although nitrate remains a problem to be dealt with. The PAS was altered on a farm in Northwest Louisiana and shows promise. The beauty of this system is the conversion of a conventional 6-acre catfish pond into this alternative method. A question that came up here is, Can you recommend a patented system, how does the farmer get hold of it, and how much does he need to change it to get around the patent if the patent becomes an obstacle? In most systems mentioned, pond soils have been eliminated as a confounding element in water quality. Further alternatives to earthen pond aquaculture may be reshaping the ponds and using liners. This will assist in creating flow, enhancing aeration, eliminating stratification, eliminating blue-green algae, and stabilizing water quality control. |
|
| March 9-11, 2003 Texas
A&M University Attendees: Not available Facilitator: Not available SESSION SUMMARY: There was some discussion of attempts at heterotrophic production of shrimp and catfish using up to 14 h.p./acre continuous aeration and high feeding rates (up to 250/lb/day). Jimmy Avery mentioned interest in evaluating catfish production using a 3-phase system. He also mentioned Lou DAbramos production of crawfish in deep-water ponds without forage. |
| March 17-22, 2002 University
of Puerto Rico Attendees: Del Gatlin, TAMU; Tom Hill, UT; John Kuaryk, UPR; Michael Masser, TAMU; Charlie Shultz, UVI; Jim Tidwell, KSU; Granvil Treece, TAMU; Greg Whitis, Auburn Facilitator: Not available SESSION SUMMARY: Tom Hill informed the group of new lab and fish-culture facilities on the campus of the University of Tennessee as well as a new pond facility at Springfield. Most of the reeaerch is being directed toward Macrobrachium as there is much interest in culturing this species in the county bordering Kentucky. There is also some interest in catfish production in cages and ponds along with some culture of tilapia in recirculating systems. |
| March 19-20, 2001 Mississippi State University This IEG did not meet. |
| March 29-30, 2000 Louisiana State University This IEG did not meet. |
March 15-16, 1999 Kentucky State University |
||
| · | high school aquaculture education | |
| · | recirculating systems | |
| · | cages and net pens, | |
| · | raceways (including the PAS or Partitioned Aquaculture System). | |
| · | Auburn University representatives reported on cage culture of both catfish and tilapia by small-scale producers and raceway culture of catfish fry to reduce predation. They also reported on working with several high schools on development of aquaculture education. | |
| · | Clemson University reported on research and extension efforts with the SC marine shrimp industry. Most of this research centered around reducing discharge of effluents through utilization of oysters and clams as biofilter organisms and sludge collection and reuse. Clemson also reported on culture of mud minnows. | |
| · | Clemson University and Louisiana State University both reported on the PAS system research and private PAS production facilities. Dr. David Brune at Clemson has obtained a patent on the PAS system and is licensing its utilization for both research and commercial production. LSU also reported on recirculating research by Dr. Ron Malone and production by private tilapia facilities in Louisiana. | |
| · | The University of Florida reported on a modified above-ground raceway system that utilizes a partitioned pond as a biofilter. U of FL also reported on research on culture of gulf sturgeon. | |
| · | Kentucky State University reported on utilization of water from abandoned coal mines to produce trout and polyculture of catfish and paddlefish. KSU also reported on culture of largemouth bass and macrobrachium. | |
| · | North Carolina State University reported on recirculating systems research and development of commercial tilapia facilities based on this research. NCSU also reported on commercial cage and net pen production and research utilizing a gravity-fed, flow-through system that uses recirculating system components for waste capture. | |
| · | The University of Tennessee reported the completion of an aquaculture research facility which will work on small-scale systems with emphasis on recirculating systems and flow-through systems with water conservation. Both warm and cool water species will be studied. | |
| · | Texas A&M University reported on work with marine shrimp producers in reducing effluents through the use of man-made wetlands and reduction of stocking densities and feeding rates. | |
| March 15-17, 1998 Clemson University Attendees: Fourteen individuals were present from South Carolina (Clemson), Mississippi State, Facilitator: David E. Brune SESSION SUMMARY: |
|
| · | Two individuals reported an interest in Partitioned Aquaculture System (PAS) type applications for baitfish production to eliminate harvest problems in ponds. |
| · | Arnie Eversole reported on mussel growth in a PAS configured system, with 95% survival and 1 mm/week shell growth. He also suggested that mussels enhance bluegreen algal dominance in the system as compared to tilapia, which tend to reduce or eliminate bluegreen algal dominance. |
| · | David Brune reported on the successful use of brine shrimp to harvest algae in a PAS system. |
| · | Chuck Weirich reported ont eh installation of PAS units at LSU. |
| · | Craig Tucker reported on side scanning sonar to ascertain fish behavior and response to dissolved oxygen in ponds and the use of electric fields in enhancing fish harvest. |
| · | Jaw-Kai Wang reported on the algae/oyster/shrimp co-culture system in tank systems in Hawaii. He discussed the importance of maintaining steady state with balanced biomass levels and continuous algal harvest. He indicated that the commercial farms are receiving $10/lb for heads-on shrimp and 15-85¢ apiece for oysters. However, capital costs in Hawaii are $45,000/acre to prepare land. |
| · | Jeff Hinshaw at North Carolina State reported on a new version of the intensive tilapia production (fish farm) system run by Carolina Power and Light. He also reported on Macrorachium/trout hatchery system using warm water in summer for prawn production and cold temperatures in winter for trout production. |
| · | Rick Wallace at Auburn reported on early work with in-pond
raceways using airlift pumps growing oysters in bags. There was further discussion on PAS
systems concerning reduction of costs, and possible ultimate carrying capacity. |
March 24-26, 1997 |
|
| SOUTH CAROLINA | |
| · | Rocky English presented an update on the Partitioned Aquaculture System research at Clemson. Catfish were produced at densities approaching 15,000 pounds/acre in the confined portion of the system in the 1996 growing season, and tilapia had been produced in the partitioned area of the ponds. Photosynthesis was measured at 3 to 4 times higher than in traditionally managed ponds for catfish. Rocky handed out summary sheets showing specific measurements of chemical and production parameters from the system. Later in the discussion, Rocky inquired as to whether anyone had experience with infestation of psychodid flies (moth flies) in biofilters. The larval flies caused clogging and reduced performance of the filters in their recirculating systems at Clemson when they reached high numbers. |
| ALABAMA | |
| · | Michael Masser reported on research with in-pond raceways for catfish production. In the previous season, tilapia had been added downstream from the catfish in the systems to determine their impact on waste capture in the system and the potential for polyculture in these systems. The tilapia grew nearly as well in raceways where they were not fed as they did in raceways where they were provided with a prepared diet. Four species of freshwater mussels were tested in the raceway systems and three of the four species performed very well, gaining as much as 20% of their volume in the test period. The mussels are typically harvested for shell production. Plans are to include carp in the systems in 1997. Ron Phelps reported testing the in-pond raceway systems in brackish water using tilapia. At 14 ppt, tilapia production reached 120 kg/m3 in 90 days. |
| · | Carole Engle reported on a planned
project using a combination of pond culture and circulation through a wetland cell for
management of water quality. The project is scheduled to begin later this
year. Carole also reported on testing of in-pond biofilters
(Perschbacher) taking place in |
| At this point, considerable discussion followed on the advantages and disadvantages of circulation in ponds, including the partitioned systems, in-pond raceways or biofilters, and circulation through various pond 'cells'. The economics of pond circulation for increasing production is currently inadequately defined, however, the consensus of the group was that if off-flavor could be reduced or eliminated using these methods, then the added costs of moving water most likely would produce a favorable return. | |
| TENNESSEE | |
| · | Bill Simco made a 'tongue-in-cheek' request for development of a bio-filter system based on 'sweetgum balls', preferably from his yard! Some discussion ensued regarding the fact that they are virtually indestructible, plentiful, and have high surface area, and that Bill should patent the idea. |
| NORTH CAROLINA | |
| · | Jeff Hinshaw reported on studies evaluating seasonal production of coldwater species (rainbow trout and Atlantic salmon) in net-cages placed in small temperate impoundments. To date, production levels approaching 1,000 pounds per surface acre have not resulted in significant water quality changes in the impoundments. The primary influence on levels of phosphorus in the systems is the level in the inflowing stream. Plans are to increase the production levels to approximately 2,000 pounds/acre in 1997/98. The systems are based on stocking the fish in October with complete harvest in May each year. The pens are left empty during the summer. Jeff also reported on development work at NCSU by Tom Losordo on economical de-nitrification systems for use with recirculating aquaculture facilities. This work has just started and should proceed through 1997/98. |
| ALABAMA | |
| · | Dave Cline described the cage culture
industry for production of catfish in northern Alabama. Approximately 200 to 250
producers are growing catfish or are holding the fish for stocking or processing typically
in rectangular cages in small impoundments. |
Finally,
the question was raised to the group as to whether there were any successful commercial recirculating aquaculture systems still operating in the US.
Some facilities were mentioned, but no definitive number was agreed upon. The need
for economic evaluation of pond systems using recirculation to enhance productivity or
improve water quality was reiterated by most in the discussion group. |
|
March 24-26, 1996 University of |
|
| · | Ron Hodson of North Carolina and
Larry Wilson of |
| · | Greg Clary, an extension economist with Texas A & M |
| Three different raceway systems were discussed. | |
| · | John Morrison, formerly of the Southeastern Fish Culture Lab
in |
| · | Mike Masser discussed in-pond or
floating raceways that he is developing at |
| · | Chris Hyde reported on a commercial producer in north |
| · | John Collier of |
March 18-20, 1995 |
|
| · | Mike Masser reported on research with floating raceway production systems for catfish production. Yields of over 500 Ibs/m3 have been attained with a feed conversion of 1.5. Work with the raceway system including further evaluation of waste collection is continuing. |
| · | Len Lovshin discussed result on a pond/tank recirculating catfish production system using a low head oxygenation device (LHO). Preliminary results showed that although fish production and water quality were promising, the costs of the system were noncompetitive with pond production. |
| FLORIDA | |
| · | Andy Lazur reported on a pond/plastic lined, earthen raceway recirculating system with oxygen supplementation with a LHO for the production of catfish and hybrid bass. The study showed that the system as designed was biologically, but not economically feasible. Andy mentioned that Frank Chapman Is currently evaluating a solar heating demonstration project incorporating a recirculating tank and vegetable production unit. Year one of a golden shiner/catfish rotation project showed good golden shiner production from May to October, but the production of small (1/2 lb.) catfish from October to April was minimal due to an outbreak of POD. |
| · | Jimmy Avery discussed Ron Malone's continued efforts in bead filter research and tilapia production. One project involves use of waste heat from a vinegar processing facility. Another project involves the filtration studies for red drum culture. In addition, work with biofiltration in alligator systems to reduce ammonia waste is being conducted. |
| · | Jeff Hinshaw discussed Tom Losordo's studies on a new Norwegian biofiltration system for tilapia and hybrid bass. Jeff reported on efforts to incorporate water reuse and filtration in trout raceway systems. Studies with net-pen trout production in lakes is encouraging with good fish production and economic return. Studies with salmon and yellow perch are planned in near future. |
| · | Tom Schwedler reported on studies on high density catfish production in cages with yields of 10 lbs./ft3. In addition, he discussed the partitioned aquaculture system that incorporates raceways with catfish, settling basins, low energy water circulation and algal removing system. Fish production results showed rapid growth with a feed conversion of 1.4. |
| TEXAS | |
| · | Joe Lock reported on continued studies with red drum culture. The cold water appears to be a limiting factor. Ponds with black plastic covered corners to allow for heat retention are presently being evaluated. He discussed a largemouth bass double cropping system involving production of bass fingerlings followed by pond draining and tilapia or catfish growout. |
| Future Needs. Two major topics were identified as essential to more completely evaluate alternative culture systems. These include studies involving the environmental impact of alternative systems, particularly net-pens which are not as common. Secondly, complete information on the economic considerations of all of these systems is lacking and is critical for further development. | |
March
13-15, 1994 |
|
| · | |
| · | Kentucky |
| · | North Carolina |
| · |
The |
| · | Auburn |
|
|
| · | developing economic data on alternative aquacultural systems, and |
| · | examining the economics of all aquacultural research. |